Prose Pros and Cons.
We’ve all done it, I’m sure all writers have been guilty of it
on more than one occasion. I know I have, and only notice when I edit the
manuscript several months after completing the story. What sounds like the most
beautiful use of scenic description, reads like poetry and paints a scene so
sublime that Leo da Vinci would be jealous, is not necessarily the right way to
write a novel. Have you ever read a novel, where a chapter starts by describing
the scenery, only to find yourself reading about the same scene paragraphs
later? I know I have, and it’s dull as dish water! You picked up a book
expecting a tale of some sort, and instead what you get is a detailed
description of watercolour challenge.
So how do you know when you’ve used too much text? Often it’s
difficult to see straight away, which is why I leave my finished work for about
6 months before going back to edit. That’s when I usually notice erroneous adjectives.
When reading a book, you don’t want to fumble through the prose trying to find
the story hidden away do you? I try to only put in a couple of lines as and
when it’s necessary so as to promote the use of imagination. I’ve spoken to
some readers who don’t like this and prefer as much detail as possible in the
books they read, because it helps them get a fuller picture of what’s going on,
and there’s nothing wrong with that. Sorry to sound like a broken record, but
it always comes down to preference.
I know I prefer to use my imagination when reading because I
can visualise stories while I read them with ease, not everyone can so they
require a bit more detail. What about you? When reading, do you like a little
or a lot? If writing, how do you notice when you’ve used too much text, or not
enough? Let me know what you think in the comments below.
Read, follow, comment and enjoy. M x
No comments:
Post a Comment